Peer Review Process
1. Initial Screening
All the manuscripts sent to IJRDO - Journal of Food and Nutrition are initially reviewed by the editorial team. This is taken to make sure that the paper is pertinent to the journal and covers minimal quality and formatting requirements.
2. Reviewer Assignment
Appropriate manuscripts are then sent to experts in the subject to review. Our peer-review is blind and thus the reviewer is free to evaluate the work without any bias.
3. Evaluation Criteria
The manuscript is evaluated by reviewers on the basis of:
Feedback & Revision
4. Reviewer Feedback
Detailed comments and suggestions are given to authors. This critique is supposed to enhance the overall quality, clarity, and the impact of the manuscript.
5. Revision Process
Writers have to revise their paper under the recommendations of critics and hand in the edited paper within the set deadline.
6. Editorial Decision
The editorial team makes the final judgment after going over the revised copy:
Ethics & Publication
7. Ethical Standards
The process is carried out confidentially. Ethical practices are supposed to be practiced by all participants, and this should be fair and respectful.
8. Publication Outcome
Upon acceptance, the manuscript is published in the next issue of the journal.